Stella Rahman v. Women’s Health in Women’s Hands Community Health Centre
0901-00-U Stella Rahman, Applicant v. Women’s Health in Women’s Hands Community Health Centre, Responding Party.
BEFORE: Laura Trachuk, Vice-Chair.
DECISION OF THE BOARD; July 27, 2000
The style of cause is hereby amended to reflect the correct name of the responding Party: “Women’s Health in Women’s Hands Community Health Centre”.
This is an application under section 96 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 (the “Act”) alleging that the responding party has violated sections 72 and 76.
In its response to the application, the responding party asks that certain paragraphs of the complaint be struck out. It also alleges that the application does not make out a prima facie case i.e. it does not allege facts upon which the Board could find that sections 72 or 76 had been violated. The Board hereby directs the applicant to reply to the responding party’s claims that the application is deficient. She is also directed to set out those facts, if any, contained in the response, with which she disagrees. The Board also directs the applicant to specify clearly what facts she relies upon to support her complaint that the responding party has violated sections 72 or 76.
The applicant’s submissions should be filed with the Board and provided to the responding party on or before Monday, August 14, 2000.
After reviewing the submissions the Board will decide whether to exercise its discretion to proceed further with the matter.
“Laura Trachuk”
for the Board