Ontario Labour Relations Board
Angelo Oddi, Applicant v. I.C.P. Workers Independent Union, Responding Party v. International Comfort Products Corporation (Canada), Intervenor.
George Aitchison, Applicant v. ICP Workers Independent Union, Responding Party v. International Comfort Products Corporation (Canada), Intervenor.
Before: Brian McLean, Vice-Chair.
Decision of the Board: September 7, 2000
Decision
1These are applications under section 96 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 (“the Act”) in which it is alleged that the union has violated section 74 of the Act.
2The responding party has requested that the Board either require the applicants to provide additional information about their complaints or to dismiss the complaints without a consultation or hearing. The applicants have responded to the responding party’s request.
3It appears that the only new issue raised in the applicant Aitchison’s material is the allegation that the responding party refused a request made by the past president of the union to meet with counsel for the responding party so that the past president could provide information which might support a “past practices” argument.
4Before the Board determines whether these matters ought to proceed to hearing, the responding party is directed to respond to the allegations contained in the applicant’s recent correspondence. Such response must be filed with the Board by September 15, 2000.
“Brian McLean”
for the Board