Ontario Labour Relations Board
Between: Joseph-Giuseppe Iantomasi, Applicant v. United Food and Commercial Workers International Union AFL CIO CLC Local 617P, Responding Party.
Before: Anthony Brown, Vice-Chair.
Decision of the Board: September 1, 2000
Decision of the Board
1In July, 2000, the applicant attempted to file an application pursuant to section 96 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 (the "Act") alleging violation of numerous sections of the Act.
2By letter dated July 13, 2000, the Registrar informed the applicant that the application was being returned to the applicant without having been processed because it did not comply with the Board’s Rules of Procedure.
3On August 31, 2000, the Applicant again filed an application against the same parties pursuant to section 96 alleging violation of numerous sections of the Act. This application appears to be substantially similar to the previously filed application that was returned.
4The applicant has apparently not served this application (or the previously filed application) upon the responding parties. The Rules of Procedure are very clear that it is the duty of an applicant to serve a complete copy of an application upon the other parties.
5The Board will not process this application. The Registrar is directed to close this file.
6If the applicant wishes to file a properly served and completed application that is in compliance with the Board’s Rules of Procedure, he is, of course, entitled to do so. Any such application must set out how the responding parties are alleged to have violated each section of the Act named by the applicant, and shall state the material facts relied upon to support each such allegation, including who is alleged to have done the acts complained of, and when the events occurred.
"Anthony Brown"
for the Board