1508-99-G Carpenters and Allied Workers Local 27, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Applicant v. Canning Contracting Limited, Bradsil Limited, Daros Management Limited, Oswenda Investments Limited, Oswenda Management Limited, Oswenda (Danforth) Limited, Daros Investments Limited, Mekela Limited, and Mekela Management Limited, Responding Parties.
1512-99-R Carpenters and Allied Workers Local 27, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Applicant v. Canning Contracting Limited, Bradsil Limited, Daros Management Limited, Oswenda Investments Limited, Oswenda Management Limited, Oswenda (Danforth) Limited, Daros Investments Limited, Mekela Limited, and Mekela Management Limited, Responding Parties.
2048-99-G United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 785, Applicant v. Canning Contracting Limited, Bradsil Limited, Daros Management Limited, Oswenda Investments Limited, Oswenda Management Limited, Oswenda (Danforth) Limited, Daros Investments Limited, Mekela Limited, and Mekela Management Limited, Responding Parties.
2259-99-R International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftsmen (now known as Brick and Allied Craft Union of Canada, Local 12), Applicant v. Canning Contracting Limited, Bradsil Limited, Daros Management Limited, Oswenda Investments Limited, Oswenda Management Limited, Oswenda (Danforth) Limited, Daros Investments Limited, Mekela Limited, and Mekela Management Limited, Responding Parties.
2266-99-G International Union of Bricklayers and Allied Craftsmen (now known as Brick and Allied Craft Union of Canada, Local 12), Applicant v. Canning Contracting Limited, Bradsil Limited, Daros Management Limited, Oswenda Investments Limited, Oswenda Management Limited, Oswenda (Danforth) Limited, Daros Investments Limited, Mekela Limited, and Mekela Management Limited, Responding Parties.
BEFORE: Gail Misra, Vice-Chair, and Board Members J. G. Knight and G. McMenemy.
DECISION OF THE BOARD; August 22, 2000
1By a letter dated August 8, 2000 the responding parties made several requests regarding the production of documents that is being made in these proceedings. The Board has now received the applicants’ submissions regarding those requests.
2Having considered the parties’ submissions the Board orders that the information and documentation produced by the responding parties in these proceedings be kept entirely confidential and be used only for the purposes of these proceedings.
3The Board will permit the responding parties to “black out” any confidential information contained in the documents to be produced to the applicants so long as the responding parties have a reasonable belief that the information is not relevant to these proceedings. However, the responding parties are directed to bring to the hearing of these matters all documents that have any “blacked out” portions so that in the event of a challenge, the Board may make an informed decision about the obscured information.
4Finally, the Board orders that all documentation and information produced by the responding parties in these proceedings, including copies thereof, be returned to the responding parties by the applicants at the conclusion of the proceeding. The Board declines the applicants’ request that the responding parties be required to pay for the costs of returning the documents.
5The Board’s orders apply to all representatives of the applicants who will have access to the information and documentation produced by the responding parties to these applications.
6This panel is not seized.
“Gail Misra”
for the Board