Canadian Union of Public Employees v. Algonquin Child & Family Services
2184-00-R Canadian Union of Public Employees, Applicant v. Algonquin Child & Family Services, Responding Party.
BEFORE: Anthony Brown, Vice‑Chair, and Board Members J. A. Ronson and H. Peacock.
DECISION OF ANTHONY BROWN, VICE-CHAIR, AND BOARD MEMBER H. PEACOCK; October 31, 2000
This is an application for certification.
The Board finds that the applicant is a trade union within the meaning of section 1(1) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 (“the Act”).
It appears to the Board on an examination of only the information provided in the application and the information and membership evidence filed by the applicant (see section 8(3) of the Act), that not less than forty per cent of the individuals in the bargaining unit proposed in the application for certification were members of the union at the time the application was made.
The responding party disputes the applicant’s estimate of the number of employees in the applicant’s proposed bargaining unit. Furthermore, the responding party proposes a different bargaining unit from that proposed by the applicant and it contends that the applicant’s bargaining unit could not be appropriate. It gives notice under section 8.1 of the Act.
After comparing the membership evidence provided by the applicant as against the information provided by the responding party, the Board finds that the numerical difference between the parties is not significant and that the applicant has established sufficient membership support in its proposed bargaining unit for the purposes of obtaining a representation vote and having that vote counted.
The Board directs that a representation vote be taken of the individuals in the following voting constituency:
all employees of Algonquin Child & Family Services in the Districts of Muskoka, Nipissing and Parry Sound, save and except Supervisors/Senior Therapists, persons above the rank of Supervisor/Senior Therapist, persons employed in a confidential capacity with respect to labour relations and students employed in Co-Operative Work Placement Programs.
The vote will be held on November 2, 2000. Other vote arrangements will be as determined by the Registrar and set out on the attached "Notice of Vote and of Hearing".
All individuals who had an employment relationship with the responding party in the voting constituency on October 26, 2000, the certification application filing date, are eligible to vote. Employees having an employment relationship on October 26, 2000, the certification application filing date, include employees who were not at work on that date, so long as there is a reasonable expectation of their return to employment.
There is a dispute between the parties as to whether the bargaining unit should include only employees working for the responding party in North Bay or whether it should include employees working for the responding party in the Districts of Muskoka, Nipissing and Parry Sound. The ballots cast by employees employed in North Bay shall be segregated and counted separately from the ballots cast by other employees in the voting constituency.
Voters will be asked to indicate whether or not they wish to be represented by the applicant in their employment relations with the responding party.
The responding party is directed to post copies of this decision and of the "Notice of Vote and of Hearing" adjacent to each of the posted copies of the "Notice to Employees of Application for Certification". These copies must remain posted for 30 days.
Any party or person who wishes to make representations to the Board about any issue remaining in dispute which relates to the application for certification, other than status disputes, including any matters relating to the representation vote, must file a detailed statement of representations with the Board and deliver it to the other parties, so that it is received by the Board within five days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays on which the Board is closed) of the date on which the vote is taken. Representations with respect to any status dispute must be made in accordance with the directions provided in Information Bulletin No. 4: Status Disputes in Certification Applications (Non-Construction).
The matter is referred to the Registrar.
“Anthony Brown”
for the Board
DECISION OF BOARD MEMBER J. A. RONSON; October 31, 2000
- The employer has pleaded that section 8.1 applies. As a result, there should be no vote until the issues are dealt with at a hearing. If a vote is ordered, then at the least, the ballot box should be sealed until the section 8.1 issues are resolved.
“J. A. Ronson”