Licence Appeal Tribunal
RECONSIDERATION ORDER
Before: Craig Mazerolle, Vice-Chair, Delegate
Tribunal File Number: 17651/HTA
Case Name: Anmol Singh v. Registrar of Motor Vehicles
For the Appellant: Barinder Grewal, Paralegal
ORDER
1By way of a letter from his representative (dated November 20, 2025), the appellant is asking for a reconsideration of the Tribunal’s decision released on November 4, 2025 (“decision”). The Tribunal’s decision confirmed the Registrar’s suspension of the appellant’s Class A driver’s licence. According to paragraph 2 of the decision, the adjudicator “gave oral reasons for that decision.”
2Pursuant to s. 17(2) of the Adjudicative Tribunals Accountability, Governance and Appointments Act, 2009, S.O. 2009, c. 33, Sched. 5, the Executive Chair has delegated to me authority to deal with such matters.
3The appellant’s request for reconsideration is dismissed for the following reasons.
4At paragraph 5(iii) of the decision, the Tribunal ordered: “A party seeking reconsideration of the decision must either have requested written reasons orally at the conclusion of the hearing or must do so in writing no more than 14 days after the date of this Order”. According to his representative’s letter, the appellant is seeking “the Written Reasons for the Decision”. Since written reasons were not issued prior to sending in his request for reconsideration, the appellant is not permitted to request a reconsideration of the decision at this time.
5More importantly though, without written reasons, the Tribunal is left unable to assess the merits of the appellant’s request for reconsideration. A party requesting reconsideration has the onus to demonstrate that their request meets the standard for granting a reconsideration under Rule 18.2 of the Licence Appeal Tribunal Rules, 2023 (“Rules”). Without being able to connect the grounds proposed for this reconsideration request to any written reasons provided by the Tribunal, I find the appellant has not met the onus under Rule 18.2.
6On this basis, the appellant’s request for reconsideration is dismissed.
7I also note that there are several procedural deficiencies with the appellant’s request.
8First, Rule 18.1(b) states that a party seeking reconsideration must ensure the “request is served on all parties and filed with the Tribunal using the form for reconsideration requests on the Tribunal's website”. The appellant did not include a completed Request for Reconsideration form with his letter dated November 20, 2025.
9Second, the representative who completed this letter, Barinder Grewal, has not provided a completed Declaration of Representative to the Tribunal. Rule 24.2 requires this form to be completed by any representative who is seeking to be recognized by the Tribunal.
Craig Mazerolle Vice-Chair, Delegate
Released: November 30, 2025