7b:I[968242,["/_next/static/chunks/0b_72f-e25kv0.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/2dqzcpp0iv_65.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/2-gzvss-l6hsb.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/0_th5qbdbp7fv.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/3pxtaj7c8rs55.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/1fr-v8sx5ap_7.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/2_zpbictxcli5.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/2yad5-4ibvk0m.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/0rilgbl3o5bv-.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/21ewgwknlgeas.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/2ov37zop16n27.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/0tof0ca8-y5uc.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/3sl10ogzeq_4f.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/1oye9k9wdtez4.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/2qpeh4lw4hds4.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/23d_j_uhqaepb.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/2qthtgzpqespl.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/1o37bbh4k8kg0.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/1l1-kbc27ddmr.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/06sx6w4g9hwyu.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/3abc7e_uryvi3.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/0257p7bsqes76.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/0hfvn4ww_ph62.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/15-zu1noqxrht.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/0ovufyqn1ws-o.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/08dzzn4r58_fn.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/0ce8qgl2n3g61.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA","/_next/static/chunks/3au34nv6rkr0s.js?dpl=dpl_En1UDUEm7jRVtGb5amdob4zyKajA"],"SidebarDataSetter"] 7c:T1a4c,GSB#2003-3774 UNION# 2004-0999-0002 ## IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Under THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT Before THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD # BETWEEN Ontario Public Service Employees Union (Union Grievance) ## Union - and - The Crown in Right of Ontario (Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services) Employer BEFORE Felicity D. Briggs Vice-Chair FOR THE UNION Stephen Giles Grievance Officer Ontario Public Service Employees Union FOR THE EMPLOYER Greg Gledhill Staff Relations Officer Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services HEARING November 15, 2005. Decision From March 13^th to May 6^th 2002, the Union and its members were engaged in a legal strike. Prior to the beginning of this action the parties had negotiated a Memorandum of Agreement regarding the conditions of work in the event of a strike or a lockout (hereinafter referred to as the “Conditions Document”). In that agreement it was provided that “all collective agreement provisions apply to essential and emergency workers without interruption, save only that Appendix 9 and Appendix 18 shall not apply”. The Conditions Document also expressly provided the Union’s continued right under Article 22.13 of the Collective Agreement to file Union grievances on behalf of employees who were performing essential and emergency services. During the course of the strike approximately 5000 grievances were filed by Union members across the Ontario Public Service. As part of the negotiations that ended the work stoppage, the parties negotiated a Return to Work Protocol. That agreement contemplated various provisions including how continuous service, pension, credits and seniority would be affected as a result of the strike. Additionally, the parties addressed other issues such as reprisal, discipline and the mechanics of the actual return of the bargaining unit members to the workplace. It was further agreed these “strike related” grievances would be treated separately and litigated in an efficient manner. To that end, on June 27, 2002, OPSEU and the Ministry of Public Safety and Security (hereinafter referred to as “MPSS”) met to discuss a process in order to resolve the outstanding strike related grievances. Following that meeting a letter, dated October 11, 2002, confirmed the agreement that: In order to deal with the strike related grievances in a proactive, expeditious and effective manner, the parties have agreed to the following: • No stage 2 hearings • No filing of strike related grievances at GSB, until agreed otherwise • Waiving of time limits • Respectively assigning dedicated resources to deal with the volume Approximately 4500 grievances were filed by members employed by the MPSS. The parties agreed to a Dispute Resolution Protocol for MPSS that included Terms of Reference. It is not necessary to provide all of that agreement. It is sufficient to say that the parties agreed to an expedited process wherein each party provides to the Vice Chair written submissions which include the facts, provisions of the Collective Agreement, the Essential Services Agreement, legislation or any other document alleged to have been violated, arguments and requested remedy. Oral evidence would not be called although it was allowed that I could request further clarification if necessary. In the event of any confusion regarding the facts of the matter or the underlying rationale, I will direct the parties to speak again with their principles. Notwithstanding that some grievors might wish to attend and provide oral evidence, this process has been efficient and has allowed for a thorough canvassing of the facts and arguments with respect to the various issues. Other procedural issues were addressed to ensure that grievances would be dealt with in a timely fashion. The Terms of Reference also provided that I would remain seized of all outstanding strike related grievances filed by members working in MPSS. This process was developed in consideration of Article 22.16.2 of the collective agreement. It states: The mediator/arbitrator shall endeavour to assist the parties to settle the grievance by mediation. If the parties are unable to settle the grievance by mediation, the mediator/arbitrator shall determine the grievance by arbitration. When determining the grievance by arbitration, the mediator/arbitrator may limit the nature and extent of the evidence and may impose such conditions as he or she considers appropriate. The mediator/arbitrator shall give a succinct decision within five (5) days after completing proceedings, unless the parties agree otherwise. The majority of the 4500 grievances dealt with one of the following issues: • An allegation of delayed retroactive payments with a request for interest owing; • An allegation of failure to pay appropriate holiday pay for Good Friday and Easter Monday; • Entitlement to call back; • On-Call and Standby issues for emergency workers. Those matters were separately litigated at the Grievance Settlement Board and decisions either have been issued or are pending. In accordance with the agreement of the parties a number of hearing days were scheduled to hear and determine the outstanding strike related grievances. Many of the grievances have been resolved through mediation. During the course of the hearings into these matters it became apparent that reasoned decisions were no longer necessary. The major issues between the parties had been canvassed, litigated and decided in various awards and settlements. It was also clear that time constraints were such that the outstanding issues had to be determined in a more expeditious fashion and therefore the parties agreed that many of the remaining matters would be decided without reasons. In this instance, as in a number of previously issued decisions, I provide a remedy that is less that what was being requested by the grievors. However, the remedy I have ordered reflects the appropriate result in this circumstance. A number of grievances were filed by Correctional Officers and other at the Thunder Bay Jail that alleged they should have been paid for a number of days during the legal strike in March and April. I am of the view that the grievances should be upheld in part. I order that each grievor who was scheduled to work on March 14^th, 15^th and/or 16^th 2002 and who has not yet received compensation for any or all of these days, shall be paid for eight hours per scheduled day. I remain seized in the event there are difficulties implementing this order. Dated in Toronto, this 21^st of November, 2005.31:["$","$L7b",null,{"caseData":{"id":197917,"body":"$7c","year":2005,"court":{"id":26,"name":"Grievance Settlement Board","slug":"ogsb","abbreviation":"OGSB"},"issues":[{"id":403963,"outcome":"granted in part — grievors to be paid for eight hours per scheduled day on March 14, 15, and 16, 2002","description":"Whether the grievors should be paid for scheduled work days during the legal strike.","issue_index":0}],"judges":[],"source":"https://www.canlii.org/en/on/ongsb/doc/2005/2005canlii54837/2005canlii54837.html","lawyers":[],"parties":[{"id":25973,"name":"Ontario Public Service Employees Union","role":"applicant"},{"id":77271,"name":"The Crown in Right of Ontario (Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services)","role":"respondent"}],"summary":"The Union filed grievances on behalf of Correctional Officers and others at the Thunder Bay Jail, alleging they should have been paid for certain days during a legal strike in March and April 2002. The parties had agreed to an expedited dispute resolution protocol for strike-related grievances. The Vice-Chair upheld the grievances in part, ordering the Employer to pay each grievor who was scheduled to work on March 14, 15, and/or 16, 2002, for eight hours per scheduled day.","citation":"Ontario Public Service Employees Union v. Ontario (Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services) 2005 OGSB mini 137","court_id":26,"keywords":["essential services","expedited arbitration","grievance","return to work protocol","strike"],"province":{"id":1,"name":"Ontario","abbreviation":"ON"},"one_liner":"Grievances for unpaid wages during a legal strike upheld in part; compensation ordered for specific scheduled days.","case_types":["trial"],"date_heard":"2005-11-15","cited_cases":[],"disposition":"allowed_in_part","has_dissent":false,"legal_tests":[],"panel_split":false,"source_slug":"/en/on/ongsb/doc/2005/2005canlii54837/2005canlii54837.html","times_cited":0,"areas_of_law":[{"id":10010,"name":"Employment and Labour Law","slug":"employment-and-labour-law"}],"file_numbers":[{"id":195146,"file_number":"GSB#2003-3774"},{"id":195147,"file_number":"UNION# 2004-0999-0002"}],"party_string":"Ontario Public Service Employees Union v. The Crown in Right of Ontario (Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services)","tax_metadata":null,"document_kind":"decision","fact_patterns":[{"id":185887,"name":"essential workers","slug":"essentialworkers"},{"id":20138,"name":"expedited arbitration","slug":"expedited-arbitration"},{"id":42180,"name":"legal strike","slug":"legal-strike"},{"id":3204,"name":"unpaid wages","slug":"unpaid-wages"}],"hearing_dates":["2005-11-15"],"canonical_year":2005,"date_judgement":"2005-11-21","decisionMakers":[{"id":6911,"name":"Felicity D. Briggs","role":"sole","slug":"felicitydbriggs","title":"Vice-Chair"}],"external_links":[{"id":216524,"url":"https://www.canlii.org/en/on/ongsb/doc/2005/2005canlii54837/2005canlii54837.html","label":"Source","domain":"www.canlii.org","url_path":"/en/on/ongsb/doc/2005/2005canlii54837/2005canlii54837.html"}],"noindex_reason":null,"citation_scheme":"mini","decision_number":54837,"final_judgement":"Grievances upheld in part; compensation ordered for March 14, 15, and 16, 2002.","representatives":[{"kind":"agent","name":"Greg Gledhill","role":"for the Employer"},{"kind":"union_rep","name":"Stephen Giles","role":"for the Union"}],"source_language":"unknown","expert_witnesses":[],"canonical_path_id":"m137","financial_outcomes":null,"parties_anonymized":false,"statutory_provisions":[],"certification_outcome":"not_certification","legislation_citations":[{"id":296995,"url":"","title":"Crown Employees Collective Bargaining Act"}]},"tocEntries":[{"id":"in-the-matter-of-an-arbitration","text":"IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION","level":2,"children":[]},{"id":"union","text":"Union","level":2,"children":[]}],"relationships":{"same_proceeding":[],"appeal":[]},"podcastInitial":{"kind":"none"},"citingTreatmentSummary":[]}] 34:E{"digest":"NEXT_REDIRECT;replace;/ogsb/2005/m137;308;"}