CITATION: Dhir v. Dhir, 2022 ONSC 133
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 537/21
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE – ONTARIO
DIVISIONAL COURT
RE: amit jumar dhir, Applicant (Moving Party)
AND:
payal dhir, Respondent (Responding Party)
BEFORE: Swinton, Lederer and Ryan Bell JJ.
COUNSEL: Amit Jumar Dhir, Applicant (Moving Party), self-represented
Ronald S. Sleightholm, for the Respondent (Responding Party)
HEARD: in writing
ENDORSEMENT
1Although the motion record should have included an issued and entered order in accordance with the rules, the Court dispenses of the need for a formal order, given that the Moving Party is now self-represented. In the circumstances, it would not be a proper use of court resources to strike the motion from the list and have it brought back later.
2The motion for leave to appeal the order of André J. dated June 17, 2021 is dismissed. The Moving Party shall pay costs to the Responding Party in the amount of $1,750 all inclusive within 30 days.
Swinton J.
Lederer J.
Ryan Bell J.
Released: January 13, 2022