CITATION: Singh v. Mylvaganam, 2018 ONSC 5955
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 390/18
LANDLORD TENANT BOARD NOS: TNL-03340-18, TNL-03340-18-RV DATE: 2018/10/05
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT
BETWEEN:
HARBHAJAN SINGH
Sim Chahal, for the Landlord/Respondent
Landlord/Respondent
– and –
GEETARANI MYLVAGANAM
No one appearing
Tenant/Appellant
HEARD at Toronto: October 5, 2018
MYERS J. (Orally)
[1] The Tenant has not appeared. There is no evidence that she has complied with the terms of the adjournment granted at her request by Matheson J. Counsel advises that he corresponded with the tenant but he has received no funds from her.
[2] The Tenant consented to the eviction order that she now appeals. The Tenant did not obtain leave to appeal under s. 133(a) of the Courts of Justice Act RSO 1990 c.43. Leave to appeal is required for a consent order. See Eldebron Holdings Limited v. Mason, 2016 ONSC 2544.
[3] Moreover, nothing in the notice of appeal raises an error of law that could be appealable under s. 210 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 SO 2006, c.17. The appeal is therefore quashed.
[4] Costs to the Respondent fixed at $3,600.
___________________________ F.L. MYERS J.
Date of Reasons for Judgment: October 5, 2018
Date of Release: October 9, 2018
CITATION: Singh v. Mylvaganam, 2018 ONSC 5955
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 390/18
LANDLORD TENANT BOARD NOS: TNL-03340-18, TNL-03340-18-RV DATE: 2018/10/05
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
DIVISIONAL COURT
BETWEEN:
HARBHAJAN SINGH
Landlord/Respondent
– and –
GEETARANI MYLVAGANAM
Tenant/Appellant
ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
F.L. MYERS J.
Date of Reasons for Judgment: October 5, 2018
Date of Release: October 9, 2018