Court File and Parties
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 440/11
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
DIVISIONAL COURT
PARDU, SWINTON AND SLOAN JJ.
BETWEEN:
MANOUCHER BARADARAN
Appellant on Appeal
(Applicant)
– and –
ALVIN ISENBERG PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Respondent on Appeal
(Respondent)
In Person
Bernard B. Gasee, for the Respondent
HEARD at Toronto: October 5, 2012
Oral Reasons for Judgment
PARDU J. (ORALLY)
1This appeal is quashed. The appellant seeks to appeal from a final order of Low J. declaring that there was a solicitor and client relationship between the appellant and the respondent, Alvin Isenberg Professional Corporation, and remitting the matter back to an assessment officer.
2This court’s jurisdiction is limited to appeals from monetary awards, under s. 19(1)(a) and 19(1.1) of the Courts of Justice Act. The judgment appealed from is not a monetary award. Appeal quashed.
COSTS
3Costs to the respondent fixed at $3,500. Costs should follow the result.
PARDU J.
SWINTON J.
SLOAN J.
Date of Reasons for Judgment: October 5, 2012
Date of Release: November 7, 2012
CITATION: Baradaran v. Alvin Isenberg Professional Corporation, 2012 ONSC 5666
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 440/11
DATE: 20121005
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
DIVISIONAL COURT
PARDU, SWINTON AND SLOAN JJ.
BETWEEN:
MANOUCHER BARADARAN
Appellant on Appeal
(Applicant)
– and –
ALVIN ISENBERG PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Respondent on Appeal
(Respondent)
ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
PARDU J.
Date of Reasons for Judgment: October 5, 2012
Date of Release: November 7, 2012