Court File and Parties
CITATION: Baradaran v. Alvin Isenberg Professional Corporation, 2012 ONSC 5666
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 440/11
DATE: 20121005
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
DIVISIONAL COURT
PARDU, SWINTON AND SLOAN JJ.
BETWEEN:
MANOUCHER BARADARAN
Appellant on Appeal
(Applicant)
– and –
ALVIN ISENBERG PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Respondent on Appeal
(Respondent)
In Person
Bernard B. Gasee, for the Respondent
HEARD at Toronto: October 5, 2012
Oral Reasons for Judgment
PARDU J. (ORALLY)
[1] This appeal is quashed. The appellant seeks to appeal from a final order of Low J. declaring that there was a solicitor and client relationship between the appellant and the respondent, Alvin Isenberg Professional Corporation, and remitting the matter back to an assessment officer.
[2] This court’s jurisdiction is limited to appeals from monetary awards, under s. 19(1)(a) and 19(1.1) of the Courts of Justice Act. The judgment appealed from is not a monetary award. Appeal quashed.
COSTS
[3] Costs to the respondent fixed at $3,500. Costs should follow the result.
PARDU J.
SWINTON J.
SLOAN J.
Date of Reasons for Judgment: October 5, 2012
Date of Release: November 7, 2012
CITATION: Baradaran v. Alvin Isenberg Professional Corporation, 2012 ONSC 5666
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 440/11
DATE: 20121005
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
DIVISIONAL COURT
PARDU, SWINTON AND SLOAN JJ.
BETWEEN:
MANOUCHER BARADARAN
Appellant on Appeal
(Applicant)
– and –
ALVIN ISENBERG PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Respondent on Appeal
(Respondent)
ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
PARDU J.
Date of Reasons for Judgment: October 5, 2012
Date of Release: November 7, 2012