Court File and Parties
CITATION: Waldman v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, 2012 ONSC 3436
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 89/12
DATE: 20120611
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
DIVISIONAL COURT
BETWEEN:
LORNE WALDMAN
Plaintiff
– and –
THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION and THOMSON REUTERS CANADA LIMITED
Defendants
Counsel:
Louis Sokolov and Jordan Goldblatt, for the Plaintiff
Wendy Matheson and Andrew Bernstein, for the Defendants
HEARD at Toronto: June 11, 2012
Oral Reasons for Judgment
MOORE J. (orally)
[1] This is an application for leave to appeal to the Divisional Court, a decision of Perell J. certifying a class and issues for determination, pursuant to the Class Proceedings Act. Leave to appeal is addressed in s.62.02 of the Rules of Practice and the appellant is afforded two grounds upon which to seek leave, each with sub-requirements that raised the bar to be overcome at an even higher level.
[2] Leave will be granted where there is a conflicting decision by another judge or a court in Ontario or elsewhere on the matter and it is in the opinion of the judge hearing the motion desirable that leave be granted, or there appears good reason to doubt the correctness of the order in question and the proposed appeal involves matters of such importance that leave should be granted.
[3] Although I am indebted to counsel for their comprehensive review of the applicable law upon the four criteria that the applicant insists apply and have been established in order to succeed upon this application, I am not persuaded that there are conflicting decisions and/or that there is reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the motions judge.
[4] As such, this application is dismissed with costs to the plaintiff/respondent in the amount agreed upon by the parties at the commencement of the hearing.
MOORE J.
Date of Reasons for Judgment: June 11, 2012
Date of Release: June 13, 2012
Appendix / Endorsement Record
CITATION: Waldman v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, 2012 ONSC 3436
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 89/12
DATE: 20120611
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
DIVISIONAL COURT
MOORE J.
BETWEEN:
LORNE WALDMAN
Plaintiff
– and –
THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION and THOMSON REUTERS CANADA LIMITED
Defendants
ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
MOORE J.
Date of Reasons for Judgment: June 11, 2012
Date of Release: June 13, 2012