CITATION: Raso v. Estate of Raso, 2012 ONSC 230
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 241/11
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
DIVISIONAL COURT
ASTON, PEPALL AND LAUWERS JJ.
BETWEEN:
FORTUNATO RASO
Applicant
(Respondent)
– and –
FRANK RASO and THE ESTATE OF DOMENICO RASO
Appellant
(Respondent)
Gleb Bazov, for the Applicant
Ronald B. Moldaver, Q.C., for the Appellant (Respondent)
HEARD at Toronto: January 9, 2012
lauwers j. (ORALLY)
1This Court has no jurisdiction over the cross appeal. The Court has jurisdiction over the appeal but it is so intertwined with the cross appeal that both should be heard together. A motion must be brought under s. 6(3) of the Courts of Justice Act. The enforcement of the order for payment is stayed pending further order.
2The appeal and cross appeal are both adjourned without a fixed date.
ASTON J.
COSTS
3Costs of today reserved to the disposition of the matter.
LAUWERS J.
ASTON J.
PEPALL J.
Date of Reasons for Judgment: January 9, 2012
Date of Release: February 13, 2012
CITATION: Raso v. Estate of Raso, 2012 ONSC 230
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 241/11
DATE: 20120109
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
DIVISIONAL COURT
ASTON, PEPALL AND LAUWERS JJ.
BETWEEN:
FORTUNATO RASO
Applicant
(Respondent)
– and –
FRANK RASO and THE ESTATE OF DOMENICO RASO
Appellant
(Respondent)
ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
LAUWERS J.
Date of Reasons for Judgment: January 9, 2012
Date of Release: February 13, 2012