Court File and Parties
CITATION: Children’s Aid Society of Toronto v. P.L., 2011 ONSC 4818
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 294/11
DATE: 20110811
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
DIVISIONAL COURT
JENNINGS, FERRIER AND SWINTON JJ.
BETWEEN:
CHILDREN’S AID SOCIETY OF TORONTO Applicant (Respondent in Appeal)
– and –
P.L. AND V.L. Respondents (Appellants in Appeal)
Counsel: Sherri Smolkin, for the Children’s Aid Society Michal Harel, for the Child In Person
HEARD at Toronto: August 11, 2011
Oral Reasons for Judgment
BY THE COURT
[1] This motion for leave to appeal is dismissed. The moving parties submitted that leave to appeal should be granted under the provisions of Rule 62.02(4)(b). They specifically complain there is good reason to doubt the correctness of paragraphs 1(b) and 2 of the order of Backhouse J. dated June 2, 2011. The order sought, to obtain access to the audio tapes, was granted and access to the tapes, has been accomplished.
[2] The appeal has not been perfected because, we are told, the transcripts have yet to be delivered. It follows that the condition imposed regarding access to the tapes has been complied with. The imposition of a two week notice period for any further motions is a procedural matter within the discretion of the motions judge. Nothing on this record suggests the discretion was wrongly exercised.
COSTS
[3] No order for costs is sought. No order will therefore be pronounced.
JENNINGS J.
FERRIER J.
SWINTON J.
Date of Reasons for Judgment: August 11, 2011
Date of Release: August 17, 2011
CITATION: Children’s Aid Society of Toronto v. P.L., 2011 ONSC 4818
DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 294/11
DATE: 20110811
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
DIVISIONAL COURT
JENNINGS, FERRIER AND SWINTON JJ.
BETWEEN:
CHILDREN’S AID SOCIETY OF TORONTO Applicant (Respondent in Appeal)
– and –
P.L. AND V.L. Respondents (Appellants in Appeal)
ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
BY THE COURT
Date of Reasons for Judgment: August 11, 2011
Date of Release: August 17, 2011