ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
DIVISIONAL COURT
CARNWATH, FERRIER AND SACHS JJ.
B E T W E E N:
MARIE SANDRA CAROLE GOYETTE
Applicant/Respondent
- and -
RUSSELL SHANE PARKHILL
Respondent/Appellant
Dani Z. Frodis, for the Applicant/ Respondent
Thomas J. MacLennan, for the Respondent/ Appellant
HEARD at Toronto: March 14, 2008
CARNWATH J.: (Orally)
1The appellant has moved to introduce fresh evidence on the appeal. The motion is denied.
2The evidence consists of three affidavits of Ms. Goyette, obviously prepared to comply with Perell J.’s Order.
3The appellant submits the affidavit support the submission that Perell J. should have ordered the trial of an issue. We disagree. These affidavits were not before Perell J. and cannot now be used to support the submission that he should have ordered the trial of an issue.
CARNWATH J.
FERRIER J.
SACHS J.
Date of Reasons for Judgment: March 14, 2008
Date of Release: March 20, 2008
COURT FILE NO.: 32/07
DATE: 20080314
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
DIVISIONAL COURT
CARNWATH, FERRIER AND SACHS JJ.
B E T W E E N:
MARIE SANDRA CAROLE GOYETTE
Applicant/Respondent
- and -
RUSSELL SHANE PARKHILL
Respondent/Appellant
ORAL REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
CARNWATH J.
Date of Reasons for Judgment: March 14, 2008
Date of Release: March 20, 2008