CONDOMINIUM AUTHORITY TRIBUNAL
Order under Rule 4 of the Condominium Authority Tribunal’s Rules of Practice.
Member: Kathryn Kertesz, Member
The Applicant, Elizabeth Jackson, Self-Represented
The Respondent, Simcoe Condominium Corporation No. 69 Represented by, Tony Bui, Counsel
MOTION ORDER
1Elizabeth Jackson filed two applications to the Condominium Authority Tribunal (CAT). CAT application 2025-00405N was filed on June 6, 2025, and 2025-00592R was filed on August 15, 2025.
22025-00405N deals with a dispute involving a nuisance, and 2025-00592R deals with a dispute about records.
3The Respondent moved that these applications be combined in the interest of fairness and efficiency. The Applicant opposed the motion and asked that that the applications remain separate.
4After reviewing the submissions of both parties, I am not persuaded that combining these cases would promote efficiency or fairness. The issues in 2025-00405N have no apparent connection to the issues in 2025-00592R. Each matter presents different facts and issues. The Request for Records in 2025-00592R and the issues related thereto have no apparent bearing on the issues in 2025-00405N.
5I am satisfied that there is no practical benefit to expanding the scope of either matter by combining them at this time. The motion is dismissed. Both applications will remain separate and will proceed independently in Stage 2 – Mediation. If these applications proceed to Stage 3 – Tribunal Decision and the parties still feel they should be combined, they can make a motion at that time.
ORDER
6The Tribunal orders that:
- The motion is dismissed.
Kathryn Kertesz
Member, Condominium Authority Tribunal
Released on: November 19, 2025