The accused was charged with sexual interference, invitation to sexual touching, and unlawful confinement against his daughter's young friend.
The trial turned on credibility, with the accused denying the allegations and presenting evidence of his work schedule and the presence of others in the apartment.
The court rejected the accused's evidence, noting he had submitted a forged employment letter during the trial.
The court found the child complainant's evidence credible and reliable despite minor inconsistencies, concluding the Crown proved all charges beyond a reasonable doubt.
