The accused was charged with exposing his genitals and inviting a child to touch him for a sexual purpose.
The offences allegedly occurred in the bedroom of the accused's trailer during the summer of 2016.
The defence argued that the complainant's evidence was internally inconsistent regarding the frequency of the abuse and that the busy, social nature of the trailer park made the allegations implausible due to a lack of opportunity.
The court applied the W.(D.) framework and principles for assessing child witnesses, finding the complainant's core narrative credible and reliable despite peripheral inconsistencies.
The accused's denial was rejected, and he was found guilty of both counts.
