The accused was tried for prowling, a home invasion, and breach of probation.
The Crown alleged the accused was the masked prowler and the intruder who broke into the complainant's basement and assaulted him.
The court found the complainant's identification evidence unreliable due to poor lighting, discrepancies in physical descriptions, and a failed photo lineup.
However, the court found the accused guilty of breaching his probation by possessing a pellet gun, as CCTV footage proved he placed the gun in the trunk of his girlfriend's car.
