The appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking, possession of marijuana, and possession of stolen property.
He appealed on the basis that evidence obtained during execution of a search warrant at his residence should have been excluded, arguing the reviewing justice erred in considering the sufficiency of the Information to Obtain.
The Court of Appeal upheld the conviction, finding that the trial judge properly assessed the credibility and reliability of three confidential informants using the Debot criteria and that reasonable grounds existed to believe evidence of drug trafficking would be found at the residence.
