The applicant father brought a motion for increased access to the parties' child pending the completion of a section 30 assessment.
The respondent mother opposed the motion, relying on a previous consent order that maintained the current schedule until the assessment was completed, and citing concerns about the father's past alcohol use.
The court found that while the father had addressed the alcohol concerns, a significant change to the schedule was not warranted before the assessment.
However, the court partially granted the motion by modifying the access schedule to reduce the number of transitions, which was deemed to be in the child's best interests.
