The appellant requested corrections to a previous endorsement, arguing it inaccurately stated he had been charged with criminal fraud and that the insurer alleged he assisted his mother's impropriety.
The court amended the endorsement to clarify that only his mother was criminally charged, as consented to by the respondent.
However, the court declined to amend the statement regarding the civil allegations, finding that the original endorsement actually understated the severity of the insurer's fraud and conspiracy allegations against the appellant.
