The accused, charged with first degree murder, sought to exclude a statement made to police, arguing it was involuntary and obtained in breach of his s. 10(b) Charter right to counsel due to language barriers.
The court found that the accused understood the police cautions and his right to remain silent, despite some initial confusion.
The court also held that the accused's right to counsel was not breached, as he was provided with a Bengali interpreter when consulting duty counsel and during his police interview.
The statement was ruled voluntary and admissible.