The parties separated after a 31-year traditional marriage.
The applicant sought an equalization of net family property, spousal support, and a vesting order against a property owned by the respondent's corporation.
The court imputed an income of $50,000 to the respondent due to unreported cash income from his taxi business and non-compliance with financial disclosure.
The court ordered an equalization payment of $168,132.53 and a lump sum spousal support payment of $50,000.
Due to the respondent's history of defying court orders, the court pierced the corporate veil and granted a vesting order over the corporately-owned property to satisfy the equalization payment.
