The appellants appealed an order dismissing their motion for summary judgment and granting the respondents' cross-motion for summary judgment, which declared the respondents entitled to statutory rescission of their franchise agreement.
The respondents had rescinded the agreement due to the appellants' failure to provide disclosure under the Arthur Wishart Act.
The Court of Appeal upheld the motion judge's finding that the appellants were not exempt from disclosure requirements, as they had required a new franchise agreement and a $10,000 transfer fee.
The appeal was dismissed.
