The appellant, a federal public servant, grieved his suspension and subsequent dismissal under the collective agreement.
After his grievances were partially allowed and he was reinstated, he brought a civil action against his employer and several individuals alleging discrimination, intimidation, conspiracy, and interference with contractual relations.
The motions judge struck out the statement of claim on the basis that the court lacked jurisdiction.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, applying the exclusive jurisdiction model from Weber v. Ontario Hydro, finding that the essential character of the dispute arose under the collective agreement and the appellant was not deprived of an ultimate remedy.
