The applicant purchased a property in 2018 with title held 99% in his name and 1% in the names of the respondents (the parents of his fiancée).
The applicant paid the entire down payment of $430,000 and deposit of $20,000.
The respondents co-signed the mortgage and paid the monthly mortgage payments, while the applicant paid property taxes, utilities, and insurance.
After the relationship between the applicant and the respondent's daughter ended in 2020, the property was sold in 2022.
The respondents claimed either an agreement existed for a 50/50 split of proceeds or that unjust enrichment applied.
The court found no agreement existed and that unjust enrichment did not apply, ordering the proceeds to be distributed according to title (99% to the applicant, 1% to the respondents).
