M. Fairney

The accused was charged with extortion and firearms offences.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, his jury trial was suspended, resulting in a delay beyond the 30-month ceiling.

The accused brought a s. 11(b) Charter application, arguing that the suspension of jury trials was an unconstitutional overreaction to the pandemic and seeking to call expert medical evidence to challenge the lockdown measures.

The Crown brought an application to summarily dismiss the accused's motion.

The court granted the Crown's application, finding that the Chief Justice's decision to suspend jury trials was an exceptional circumstance under the Jordan framework, regardless of whether it was the correct public health response, and that the accused's motion had no reasonable prospect of success.

Following a conviction for trafficking in cocaine and possession of proceeds of crime arising from a street‑level undercover drug buy, the accused applied for a stay of proceedings on the basis of entrapment.

The court reviewed the entrapment doctrine from R v Mack and subsequent jurisprudence, including the principles governing random virtue testing and bona fide police investigations targeting areas of suspected criminal activity.

Evidence showed the undercover officer conducted an opportunity buy in an area reasonably suspected of significant drug activity and did not induce the accused beyond offering an opportunity to sell drugs.

The court rejected the accused’s claim that the officer exploited sympathy or persisted unfairly.

The accused failed to meet the burden of establishing entrapment as an abuse of process.