The parties sought clarification on the settlement of an order following a judgment declaring a bulk sale void for non-compliance with the Bulk Sales Act.
The applicant trustee argued that the respondent purchaser's liability to account for the 'value of the stock in bulk' under s. 16(2) of the Act included the HST paid on the transaction.
The court applied the modern principle of statutory interpretation and held that the plain and ordinary meaning of 'value of the stock in bulk' does not include value-added taxes like HST.
The respondent's maximum liability was therefore capped at the purchase price excluding HST, less amounts paid to secured creditors.