The accused was charged with arson and manslaughter following a fatal fire at a rooming house.
The Crown's case relied heavily on two alleged confessions by the accused and his history of making threats to burn down the building.
The court found significant credibility and reliability issues with the Crown witnesses, many of whom suffered from mental health issues or had extensive criminal records.
Furthermore, the presence of a plausible alternate suspect with a motive raised a reasonable doubt.
The accused was found not guilty on both charges.