McAfee

The plaintiffs brought a motion for directions regarding the proper scope of questioning when examining a non-party witness on a pending motion under Rule 39.03 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.

The court held that the scope of such an examination is limited solely to the personal knowledge of the witness.

A Rule 39.03 witness is not required to take reasonable steps to inform themselves prior to being examined, nor are they obliged to make enquiries of others if they cannot answer questions due to a lack of knowledge or recollection.

The moving party (defendant) in a solicitor's negligence action sought leave to amend his statement of defence to plead an alternative defence of discoverability regarding a missed limitation period for a 2001 motor vehicle accident.

The responding party (plaintiff) opposed the amendment, arguing it would cause irreparable prejudice.

The Master granted the motion, finding that the responding party's evidence of prejudice was insufficient and that any potential prejudice could be compensated by costs.