The statutory guardian of property sought leave to issue and enforce a writ of possession to remove an individual residing in the incapable person's home without authorization.
The respondent argued he provided care and support and should be permitted to remain.
The court considered the guardian’s fiduciary duties under the Substitute Decisions Act and evidence regarding the incapable person’s vulnerability, financial exploitation concerns, and availability of community support services.
The court concluded that removal of the respondent was in the incapable person’s best interests and authorized the issuance and enforcement of a writ of possession.
