The applicant sought leave to appeal a family law procedural order that extended the respondent's time to file an answer and financial statement, preserved the status quo, and fixed costs at $200.
The court reviewed the strict test under Rule 62.02(4) of the Rules of Civil Procedure and held there was neither a conflicting decision on principle nor sufficient reason to doubt the correctness of the order coupled with issues of broader importance.
Although the motion judge dealt with the Form 14B motion before expiry of the four-day response period under the Family Law Rules, the court found leave to appeal was still not warranted.
The motion for leave to appeal was dismissed.
