The Applicant brought a motion to vary a consent parenting order, seeking to impose fully supervised parenting time for the Respondent due to concerns about his mental health and alleged non-compliance with treatment recommendations.
The court dismissed the motion, finding that the Applicant failed to demonstrate a material change in circumstances or compelling evidence that the child's welfare was at risk.
The court characterized the Applicant's concerns as *quia timet* and noted that subjective fears, while understandable, do not meet the legal test for varying an interim order.
