The plaintiffs brought a motion concerning undertakings, refusals, and questions taken under advisement arising from examinations for discovery.
The court reviewed disputed undertakings and refusals involving several witnesses and determined which questions were relevant and required answers.
Many undertakings and refusals were ordered to be answered where the information was relevant and no sufficient basis for commercial sensitivity or irrelevance had been established.
Some requests were found overly broad or premature and were not required at that stage.
The plaintiffs were found substantially successful and awarded partial indemnity costs.
