The appellant appealed a trial judgment regarding custody, access, spousal support, and costs.
She argued the trial judge erred in his orders, demonstrated a reasonable apprehension of bias, and improperly denied spousal support.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the trial judge's custody and access orders were supported by evidence and reasonable.
The court found no apprehension of bias, upheld the denial of spousal support based on the parties' financial positions, and found no error in the trial costs award.