Who is Thomas Arnold?

Thomas Arnold is an Ontario lawyer with 3 court cases on record from 2014 to 2019.

What courts has Thomas Arnold appeared in?

Thomas Arnold has appeared in Superior Court of Justice, Court of Appeal, with most appearances at the Superior Court of Justice.

How many cases has Thomas Arnold handled?

Thomas Arnold has 3 cases on record from 2014 to 2019.

What judges has Thomas Arnold appeared before?

Thomas Arnold has most frequently appeared before Justice Gibson, Justice P. Lauwers, Justice G. Pardu.

Thomas Arnold | Lawyer

3 total

Glenn Schnarr & Assoc. Inc. v. Vector (Georgetown) Ltd., 2019 ONSC 519

The plaintiffs commenced an action for payment under a Cost Sharing Agreement 11 years after the defendant terminated its involvement.

The plaintiffs brought a motion to stay their own action in favour of arbitration, while the defendant brought a motion for summary judgment to dismiss the action as statute-barred.

The court dismissed the plaintiffs' motion, finding they could not stay their own proceeding under the Arbitration Act or the Courts of Justice Act.

The court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment, holding that the action was statute-barred by the two-year limitation period and that the plaintiffs were estopped by conduct and laches.

SCJJan 18, 2019

Applicant Counsel

Alilovic v. Alilovic, 2017 ONSC 6100

The moving party sought interim custody of the parties' three children, relying in part on an OCL clinical investigation recommending that all children reside with her.

The court held that on an interim custody motion the existing status quo will generally be maintained unless compelling reasons or exceptional circumstances justify immediate change.

Although the report contained relevant information, its recommendations were untested and some underlying facts were disputed.

Finding no urgency or exceptional circumstances, the court declined to make a substantive departure from the existing living arrangements and dismissed the motion.

SCJOct 12, 2017

Respondent Counsel

Halton School of Equitation Company Limited v. 2155486 Ontario Inc. (Halton School of Equitation), 2014 ONCA 112

The appellant secured creditor appealed an order permitting the respondent lien claimant to realize on proceeds from the auction sale of horses despite giving less than the two weeks' newspaper notice required by the Innkeepers Act.

The Court of Appeal held that estoppel by convention was available as a matter of law and was compatible with the statutory purpose of preserving a lien for unpaid horse-care charges.

The owner had notice and an opportunity to redeem, no public complaint arose, and the appellant knew of and was content with the sale proceeding as scheduled while intending to claim excess funds.

In those circumstances, the notice defect did not nullify the respondent's lien and the appeal was dismissed.

ONCAFeb 10, 2014