The moving party sought partial summary judgment and default judgment declaring an equitable mortgage or equitable interest over two Ottawa properties, asserting priority over liens registered by the Canada Revenue Agency for tax debts of one of the defendants.
The claim relied primarily on a written agreement and the alleged use of funds provided by the moving party in property transactions.
The court held that the agreement did not establish the essential elements of an equitable mortgage, including a clearly defined debt and intention to charge specific property as security.
Significant disputes existed regarding the source of funds and the parties’ intentions, raising credibility issues.
The court concluded that these issues required viva voce evidence at trial and dismissed the motion for summary judgment.