The appellant appealed an interim order requiring him to pay $45,000 per month in spousal support, arguing the motion judge erred by failing to apply the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines (SSAGs) for a high-income earner.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding no reversible error in the motion judge's case-specific analysis of the parties' means and needs.
The court noted that the SSAGs are not strictly presumptive for incomes over $350,000 and that interim orders are entitled to significant deference.
