The husband brought a motion to strike the wife's family law application due to her failure to disclose an interest in a foreign company on her initial financial statement.
The wife brought a cross-motion to strike the husband's answer for his ongoing failure to comply with court orders requiring financial disclosure regarding his foreign assets and income.
The court dismissed the husband's motion, finding the wife had rectified her non-disclosure and striking her pleadings was not a proportionate remedy.
The court found the husband remained in breach of prior disclosure orders but granted him one final opportunity to produce the required documents before his answer would be struck.
