Sabrina Elysia Shillingford

Police executed a search warrant at an apartment, finding a loaded firearm and various illicit drugs (crystal methamphetamine, powder cocaine, fentanyl).

Two defendants, Daylo Robinson and Dalton Wilson, were charged with multiple firearms and drug-related offences, as well as breaches of release orders.

The court assessed possession (personal, constructive, joint) based on circumstantial evidence, including the location of contraband, a digital scale, and a "daily diary" containing drug price lists.

The court found Daylo Robinson not guilty of firearms and drug charges but guilty of breaching his recognizance.

Dalton Wilson was found guilty of possession of cocaine and crystal methamphetamine for the purpose of trafficking, simple possession of fentanyl, and breach of probation, but not guilty of firearms charges and fentanyl trafficking.

The Crown brought an application to introduce evidence of other sexual activity by the complainant and a discreditable comment made by the accused, R.G., in a case where R.G. is charged with sexual interference of his stepdaughter.

The court conducted a voir dire to determine the admissibility of this evidence under the principles of s. 276 of the Criminal Code.

The court found that the evidence was not being introduced for "twin myth" reasons and was relevant to the accused's state of mind and whether he committed the actus reus.

The probative value of the evidence was determined to outweigh its prejudicial effect.

The Crown's application was granted, and the accused's comment was provisionally admissible, with a requirement for the Crown to bring a separate discreditable conduct application.