The responding employers requested reconsideration of a prior Board decision that dismissed their motion to dismiss the union's related employer and sale of business applications for post-application delay.
The request was based on the union's failure to disclose a settlement agreement with certain responding parties, which the employers characterized as akin to a 'Mary Carter agreement'.
The Board found that while the agreement should have been disclosed, its existence would not have affected the Board's earlier decision regarding post-application delay.
The request for reconsideration was dismissed.
