The respondent mother brought a motion seeking to vary a child support order to reflect the applicant father's actual income retroactively, for spousal support retroactive to June 1, 2015, to vary daycare expense sharing retroactively, for disclosure of rental property leases, and for costs.
The court granted the variations for child support and daycare expenses based on the father's actual income, ordered retroactive spousal support, and ordered the father to provide further disclosure regarding his rental properties.
The court found the respondent had made a prima facie case for interim spousal support and rejected the applicant's hardship argument given his property acquisitions.