The accused, alleged to be the getaway driver in a series of nine armed robberies, appeared for a 90-day detention review under s. 525 of the Criminal Code.
The accused proposed a new surety and argued the Crown's case was weak.
The court found the proposed surety unsuitable and the Crown's case formidable on at least one count.
Applying the secondary and tertiary grounds, the court concluded that the accused's continued detention was necessary to prevent further offences and maintain public confidence in the administration of justice.
