The applicant sought income replacement benefits (IRBs) beyond the 104-week post-accident mark, claiming a complete inability to engage in reasonably suited employment due to physical and psychological impairments from a motor vehicle accident.
The Licence Appeal Tribunal reviewed the medical evidence and the applicant's employment history, determining that reasonably suited employment included light-to-medium manual labour.
The Tribunal found that the applicant did not suffer a complete inability to engage in such employment, as objective medical assessments indicated he retained the physical, psychological, and cognitive capacity to perform light-to-medium work.
The application for IRBs and interest was dismissed.
