The applicant sought to amend her human rights application to add allegations of reprisal related to events that occurred after she began her maternity leave.
The respondents opposed the request, arguing it was untimely, prejudicial, and included privileged settlement communications.
The Tribunal granted the request to amend, finding that the new allegations related to continuing exchanges between the parties and would not require additional witnesses, thus causing no prejudice to the respondents despite the late stage of the proceeding.
