Judge-alone criminal trial on historical sexual assault-related charges involving two complainants who alleged abuse by a parental figure in the family home.
The Crown sought to rely on each complainant's evidence as similar fact evidence for the other, but the court held the Crown had not disproved an air of reality to collusion on a balance of probabilities.
After extensive review of inconsistencies, motive to fabricate, delayed disclosure, and reliability concerns, the court found the complainants' evidence did not satisfy the criminal standard.
The accused was acquitted on all counts.