The applicant, a millwright, alleged that his union discriminated against him on the basis of disability and engaged in reprisal after he was laid off from a job due to medical restrictions.
The applicant had settled his claims against the employer.
The union requested that the application be dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.
The Tribunal found that the union did not participate in a discriminatory work rule or impede the employer's accommodation efforts, as required to establish union liability.
The Tribunal also found no evidence of a nexus between the applicant's disability and the union's conduct, and no facts to support a claim of reprisal.
The application was dismissed.