On a motion to change the children's primary residence pending trial, the court considered whether the existing status quo should be disturbed on an interim basis.
Although the responding parent had repeatedly failed to comply with access orders and exposed the children to parental conflict, the court held that the untested affidavit record did not clearly and unequivocally establish that the status quo residence was contrary to the children's best interests absent an assessment recommending an immediate change.
The motion was not dismissed, but was adjourned on seven days' notice with strict interim conditions requiring school attendance, compliance with access, and full information-sharing concerning the children's medical care, education, and well-being.
Costs were left to submissions if not agreed.