The appellants appealed a motion judge's decision dismissing their action as an impermissible collateral attack on a decision of the Deputy Director of Titles.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, finding that the motion judge failed to address the appellants' request for an extension of time to appeal the Land Titles Decision.
The Court noted that one of the appellants had been acquitted of fraud in a related criminal trial, which contradicted the Deputy Director's findings, and that there were concerns about procedural fairness at the Land Titles hearing.
The action was reinstated to allow the appellants to bring a proper motion for an extension of time.