The complainant union filed complaints under section 91 of the Labour Relations Act regarding work assignments by the respondent employers to another union.
The complainant sought directions binding on other jobs and against respondents other than the specific employers complained about.
The Board held that the appropriateness of a direction binding on other jobs under section 91(2) is a matter for the merits hearing.
The Board also ruled that it has jurisdiction under section 91(1) to make directions against persons other than the party being complained about, leaving the application of this jurisdiction to the merits hearing.